Good property managers commit themselves to providing the ideal rental experience for tenants. They’ve sworn to manage tenant complaints, field queries and accommodate requests to the fullest extent their managerial powers allow, because they realize that tenants are the source of their profits, and therefore it would be mutually destructive to do anything less than keep tenants thrilled with their current living situation.
Great (and financially successful) property managers and landlords only become known as such by building effective professional relationships; they rely on the fact that their reputations for efficiency and attentiveness are cemented through heaps of praise from tenants.
Both tenants and landlords count equally on each other’s efforts to achieve peace and prosperity, which means landlords reserve the right to be as selective when vetting potential renters as tenants are when choosing places to live. And just like identifying the gems, recognizing possible indicators of a less than ideal tenant is essential to a landlord’s success, so below I’ve listed the major red flags to watch out for when screening tenant applicants.
- A bad credit score – Credit scores are maintained by making payments in a timely fashion, so it’s sensible to assume that applicants with bad credit might have trouble paying rent on time, or at all. Applicants with a score of 620 of greater are far less likely to miss payments.
- Lacking a steadily/adequately paying job – Employment status is a huge indicator of potential payment issues; if a tenant is unemployed, or employed at a job that doesn’t steadily pay at least 2.5 – 3 times the monthly rent, expect an occasional struggle when collecting their rent.
- A hurried move – Tenants might have their reasons for seeking immediate housing (leases ending, terrible previous experiences, etc.), but use your best judgement when considering these situations, as a tenant’s eagerness to jump into a rental agreement could equal their willingness to flake out of one, and stiff you.
- Needing additional time for the deposit – If a tenant can’t even manage a timely initial deposit, the probability of always receiving prompt rent from them may be practically nil.
- Poor or nonexistent references – A great reference from a previous landlord, or commendations from an employer can alleviate previous concerns about applicants. However, serious questions arise when references fail to answer questions relevant to a tenant’s reliability, or cannot be reached anywhere.
- Applicants new to living together – The potential for miscommunication between you and your renters rises slightly with each additional tenant per unit, but the main concern with multiple applicants is whether they can coexist peacefully as roommates, which hasn’t been proven if tenants have never before lived together successfully. Failed experiments in companionship easily lead to broken leases and lost profits.
- Over 3 (serious) convictions in 5 years – If tenants consistently break the law, it’s difficult to expect them to honor your building regulations, or respect lease agreements.